The New York Times union has announced a one-day strike

Reporters and editors at The New York Times announced a one-day strike Thursday, saying negotiations between their union and the company have dragged on and shown limited progress.

The contract between The Times and The New York Times Guild expires in March 2021, after about 40 bargaining sessions. Negotiators failed to reach an agreement on salaries, health and pension benefits and other issues.

More than 1,100 workers signed a 24-hour strike pledge. The union negotiating the contract, which is part of the News Guild of New York, represents about 1,450 employees in the newsroom, advertising and other areas of the company. More than 1,800 people work in The Times newsroom.

In a statement Wednesday evening, the union accused The Times of bargaining in bad faith.

“Their wage proposal still fails to meet economic momentum, lagging far behind both inflation and the average rate of wage gains in the United States,” the union said in its announcement of the strike.

In a note to the newsroom, Joe Kahn, managing editor of The Times, said he was disappointed by the union’s decision.

“Strikes usually happen when talks are deadlocked. That is not where we are today,” said Mr. Khan said. “While the company and News Guild remain separate on a number of issues, we are continuing trade proposals and moving toward an agreement.”

Compensation is the most contentious aspect of the negotiations. The Times offered union members a 5.5 percent raise after the agreement was ratified, 3 percent raises in 2023 and 2024, and a 4 percent retroactive bonus to make up for the lack of raises since the contract expired. The union has proposed a 10 percent raise upon approval, 5.5 percent raises in 2023 and 2024, and an 8.5 percent pioneer bonus.

Other issues discussed during the talks included return-to-work policies and the company’s performance appraisal system for employees. In a study released in August, the union said the system was discriminatory.

“White guild members were more likely to receive the best ratings, while black and Hispanic members were more likely to receive the lowest two ratings,” the study said.

After the union released the report, The Times’ senior management team examined ways to improve the appraisal process. In October, managing editor Mark Lacey announced plans to revamp it.

“Our ultimate goal is to have a simple system that applies fairly and consistently to everyone and focuses more on thoughtful feedback than ratings,” said Mr. Lacy wrote.

During a walkout, non-union newsroom employees are often responsible for preparing the news report.

“We will make a strong statement on Thursday,” said Mr. Khan wrote in his email to the newsroom. “But it will be harder than usual.”

Faced with a slowdown in advertising and an uncertain economic outlook, some media companies have cut staff in recent weeks, including CNN, BuzzFeed and the Gannett newspaper chain. During its negotiations with the Times, union negotiators argued that reporters and editors were struggling with inflation as the company made healthy operating profits.

Meredith Kobit Levien, chief executive of The Times, wrote in an company-wide email that the investment in news reporting has resulted in higher-paying, more secure jobs for many journalists. Profits are not catching up to where they were decades ago, he said.

“Those investments are possible because of the intense focus we have taken to return to economic growth in an industry that has been radically transforming as an organization over the past decade,” Ms. Levien said. “We’ve done so by making financial decisions that are sustainable not only at this time, but for years to come.”

Times journalists rarely go on strike. They did so for less than a day in 1981, and in 2017 there was a small walkout to protest the removal of the copy desk. No labor action has halted publication of The Times since a strike by journalists and others in 1978 that lasted 88 days.

The union plans to protest outside the Times headquarters in New York on Thursday afternoon.

Source link

Denial of responsibility! is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Similar Articles

Popular post